Confidence is built from four inputs
- Athlete evidence
- Builds with recent open-water, bike and run efforts
- Bike setup
- Builds with equipment, mass, aero and tyre detail
- Course evidence
- Partial while the 2026 route is unconfirmed
- Race-week conditions
- Historical baseline until a forecast is useful
How the model works
It starts with the targets in your Race Card, then samples the parts of a 70.3 that vary: open-water pace, transitions, bike speed at the planned power, and the drop in run performance after the swim and bike. Repeating that calculation produces a likely range rather than a single heroic number.
The current time calculation uses this race’s published distances, or standard 70.3 distances where none are published, with the available course headings, elevation and exposure evidence. Weather scenarios vary temperature, dew point, wind, gusts, rain and water conditions together. Unknown route detail stays visible as uncertainty rather than false precision.
It is not predicting your exact finishing time, placing, or race-day weather. It answers a narrower question: given the plan and the information we have, what range of day is plausible, and where is the uncertainty coming from?
Confidence is not a permanent “low”. It is recalculated across four separate inputs:
- Your evidence: consistent inputs and recent race-like swim, bike, and run results.
- Bike setup: measured or specified aerodynamics rather than a broad prior.
- The course: verified distance and route character, including elevation and technical sections.
- The conditions: a current forecast is more useful than a historical comparison.
It starts low when those inputs are broad. It can become moderate or high as the evidence improves. A narrower range means better information, not a guarantee.